2013년 12월 31일 화요일

UN talks locked on


UN talks locked on



UN climate negotiations are bogged down in a dispute over who will take legal responsibility for the loss and damage caused by climate change.Rich countries say they will strongly resist this move.Secretary general Ban Ki-moon opened the ministerial segment of the talks in Warsaw, Poland with a warning that the world was facing the wrath of a warming planet.Mr Ban called on delegates to respond with wisdom, urgency and resolve.He told delegates that climate change threatens current and future generations, referring to the recent disaster in the Philippines as an example of the extreme weather the world can expect more of.He had recently visited Iceland and was told that it may soon be a land without ice thanks to rising temperatures.He called on the negotiators to speed up their discussions that aim to secure a new global treaty in 2015.However talks here in Warsaw are on familiar territory, the old divide between rich and poor countries over who has responsibility for curbing warming and critically, who will pay for the damage caused by climate change.Many developing countries are working hard to adapt to climate change often with aid from richer countries.But campaigners say those funds alone are not enough, because weather events are becoming more extreme and often overwhelm the steps poorer countries have taken.This was exactly what happened in the Philippines says Dr Saleemul Huq, the director of the International Centre for Climate Change and Development.'The Philippines is adapted to typhoons, the people have shelters and they went to them,' he said.'In normal circumstances you would have heard nothing about it, but in this case they died in the shelters because it was a super typhoon of unprecedented magnitude.'That's loss and damage, you can't adapt to that.'At last year's UN talks in Doha the parties agreed that by the time they met in Poland, an 'international mechanism' to deal with loss and damage should be established.It has re-opened old wounds of division between rich and poor. The wealthier countries are fighting hard to have any legal responsibility for compensation diluted or removed. But according to Harjeet Singh from Action Aid, this time they won't get away with it.'There is a lot of pressure on the rich countries, they recognise there is a challenge, but they are keeping their eyes closed, I don't think that will work anymore, they have to deliver,' he said.But not everyone is so sure about that. Many campaigners fear that the influx of politicians will mean a compromise deal will be done.'I don't think we're likely to see some grand scheme materialise that addresses [loss and damage],' said Paul Bledsoe, an expert on energy and climate with the German Marshall Fund of the United States.'I think reparations is the right word, in my view it's what's being sought, on issues like slavery or war reparations, historically they have a very difficult time occurring.'Mr Bledsoe believes the most likely outcome is that the richer nations will increase their commitments on finance in return for kicking the legal mechanism into the long grass.The scale of the monies needed to help countries adapt to climate change was underlined here in Warsaw with a report that Africa would need $350bn annually if global warming rises to between 3.5 and 4C.The United Nations Environment Programme (Unep) report says that Africa is already facing costs of between $7-$15bn a year by 2020.But if action to cut carbon emissions is delayed, then the total costs could reach 4% of Africa's GDP by 2100.


Supreme Court rules drug companies exempt from lawsuits


Supreme Court rules drug companies exempt from lawsuits


© Unknown
Drug companies failed to warn patients that toxic epidermal
necrolysis was a side effect. But the Supreme Court ruled they're still
not liable for damages.
SOTT: Supreme Court rules drug companies exempt from lawsuits
July 7, 2013 | Whiteout Press

Washington. In case readers missed it with all the coverage of the
Trayvon Martin murder trial and the Supreme Court's rulings on gay
marriage and the Voting Rights Act, the US Supreme Court also made a
ruling on lawsuits against drug companies for fraud, mislabeling, side
effects and accidental death. From now on, 80 percent of all drugs are exempt from legal liability.


In a 5-4 vote, the US Supreme Court struck down a lower court's ruling
and award for the victim of a pharmaceutical drug's adverse reaction.
According to the victim and the state courts, the drug caused a
flesh-eating side effect that left the patient permanently disfigured
over most of her body. The adverse reaction was hidden by the drug maker
and later forced to be included on all warning labels. But the highest
court in the land ruled that the victim had no legal grounds to sue the
corporation because its drugs are exempt from lawsuits.


Karen Bartlett vs. Mutual Pharmaceutical Company


In 2004, Karen Bartlett was prescribed the generic anti-inflammatory
drug Sulindac, manufactured by Mutual Pharmaceutical, for her sore
shoulder. Three weeks after taking the drug, Bartlett began suffering
from a disease called, 'toxic epidermal necrolysis'. The condition is
extremely painful and causes the victim's skin to peel off, exposing raw
flesh in the same manner as a third degree burn victim.


Karen Bartlett sued Mutual Pharma in New Hampshire state court, arguing
that the drug company included no warning about the possible side
effect. A court agreed and awarded her $21 million. The FDA went on to
force both Mutual, as well as the original drug manufacturer Merck
Co., to include the side effect on the two drugs' warning labels going
forward.


Now, nine years after the tragedy began, the US Supreme Court
overturned the state court's verdict and award. Justices cited the fact
that all generic drugs and their manufacturers, some 80% of all drugs
consumed in the United States, are exempt from liability for side
effects, mislabeling or virtually any other negative reactions caused by
their drugs. In short, the Court ruled that the FDA has ultimate
authority over pharmaceuticals in the US. And if the FDA says a drug is
safe, that takes precedent over actual facts, real victims and any and
all adverse reactions.


Court ruling


The Court's ruling a week ago on behalf of generic drug makers is
actually a continuation of a ruling made by the same Court in 2011. At
that time, the Justices ruled that the original inventors and
manufacturers of pharmaceutical drugs, also known as 'name brand' drugs,
are the only ones that can be sued for mislabeling, fraud or adverse
drug reactions and side effects. If the generic versions of the drugs
are made from the exact same formula and labeled with the exact same
warnings as their brand name counterparts, the generics and their
manufacturers were not liable.


The Court ruled, "Because it is impossible for Mutual and other
similarly situated manufacturers to comply with both state and federal
law, New Hampshire's warning-based design-defect cause of action is
pre-empted with respect to FDA-approved drugs sold in interstate
commerce."


And that ruling flies in the face of both common sense and justice. And
as Karen Bartlett can now attest, it leaves 240 million Americans
unprotected from the deadly and torturous side effects of pharmaceutical
drugs. As a reminder, the number one cause of preventable or accidental
death in the US is pharmaceutical drugs.


Critics react


Immediately upon the Supreme Court's ruling, both drug manufacturers and
Wall Street investors were celebrating. As one financial analyst
pointed out, drug company profits should skyrocket going forward. Not
only do the pharmaceutical companies no longer have to worry about
safety or side effects, they are exempt from the multi-million dollar
court-imposed settlements awarded to victims of their drugs.


One industry critic was quoted by Reuters
after the verdict. "Today's court decision provides a disincentive for
generic makers of drugs to monitor safety of their products and to make
sure that they have a surveillance system in place to detect adverse
events that pose a threat to patients," Michael Carome, director of
Public Citizen's Health Research Group told the news outlet.


Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) was quick to
react to the ruling by writing a stern letter to FDA Commissioner
Margaret Hamburg, "A consumer should not have her rights foreclosed
simply because she takes the generic version of a prescription drug."


But an attorney for the drug companies, Jay P. Lefkowitz, took the
opposing position saying, "It makes much more sense to rely on the
judgments of the scientific and medical experts at the FDA, who look at
drug issues for the nation at large, than those of a single state court
jury that only has in front of it the terribly unfortunate circumstances
of an adverse drug reaction."


In other words, if the FDA says something is safe, it doesn't matter if
that decision is wrong or the result of lies, fraud or deception on the
part of the world's pharmaceutical companies. And there's no way to sue
the FDA for being wrong and costing millions of unsuspecting Americans
their lives. That result leaves 240 million Americans unprotected from
an industry responsible for more preventable deaths in the US than any
other cause.



Patient in So-Called


Patient in So-Called




We dehydrate to death helpless people in this country because they have a catastrophic cognitive impairment. Advocates for dehydration say it is just medical ethics, the withdrawal of the medical treatment of tube feeding. (Now, there is even a lawsuit to compel starvation by withholding spoon feeding–not a medical treatment!)

Dehydrating helpless people to death was once unthinkable. Then, in the 80s, bioethicists began advocating withdrawing tube-supplied food and fluids. And so it came to pass.

Advocates for dehydration started by claiming it should be reserved strictlyfor those who are unconscious. They have, of course, broadened the dehydration caste since. But recent scientific studies have now also shown that many supposedly unconscious patients arent unaware at all.

And now we learn some are paying attention to their surroundings! From the Cambridge University report:A patient in a seemingly vegetative state, unable to move or speak, showed signs of attentive awareness that had not been detected before, a new study reveals. This patient was able to focus on words signalled by the experimenters as auditory targets as successfully as healthy individuals. If this ability can be developed consistently in certain patients who are vegetative, it could open the door to specialised devices in the future and enable them to interact with the outside world.
And get this:These findings suggest that some patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state might in fact be able to direct attention to the sounds in the world around them.
If this is true of other patients, imagine the horror of hearing doctors and family discussing removing your food and water. Imagine the pain of the actual event!

Actually, we know what that is like. Kate Adamson, thought mistakenly to be unconscious after a brain stem stroke, underwent abdominalsurgery with inadequate anesthesia. She was then left unfed (but hydrated via drip) during the healing process–and it was more painful than the sensation of being cut open!

Full Article and Source:
Patient in So-Called “Vegetative State” Knew Doctors Were Dehydrating Him to Death


Marilyn Monroe At A Garage Sale


Marilyn Monroe At A Garage Sale


I love garage sales....You just never know what treasure you might find.
Someone was selling this wonderful print
of Marilyn Monroe.I love her face in this picture and the compositionof the entire print.I didn't buy it.Now I'm kicking myself for not doing so.Darn it....Have you ever passed up something at a flea marketor a garage sale that you wished you had bought?Something you can't get out of your head?At least I have a photograph ...In the same time I took to take the picture,I could have bought the print.Darn it .....Drop by my Pinterest pageand go to my Grand Dames category.


I am an idiot


I am an idiot


For the first time in over 7 years of charting, I missed my peak day. When I was bleeding on CD 24, which is what happens with no post peak support, I was like what is happening? Evidently I am little dense. The good news? No time to dwell on last cycle, this cycle is already here and time to start clomid and do it all again. And I guess it's also good that I wasn't obsessing. Or rather, the obsessing started a little late due to Halloween, etc. We had in laws in town for AJ's third birthday (how in the world is my baby three?! And so very tall!) and time just keeps flying by. I would be lying if I didn't say I was a little bummed to not have taken advantage of the opportunity since we are supposed to get pregnant as soon as possible post treatment, but I am fine. I do feel it will come. And that's what I am most anxious about. But I don't dwell on it. It isn't here yet and when/if it comes, I will have lots of opportunity to take deep breaths and hand it over to God.

I am sort of stuck in a cycle of almost get rid of yeast, but not quite, just in time to restart abx. I am doing alright. The docs are making sure we have a steady supply of the necessary meds and as soon as we stop the abx, we start that. I am not dying like I was initially, just a minor annoyance and definitely something we can handle.

And anti inflammatory diet, yeah, I suck. I haven't done it. At the risk of sounding childish, it looks extremely hard and I got overwhelmed and avoided it. Mature right? I did, however, start eating more edamame for soy, more salmon (as much as we can afford-good grief!) and trying to cut back on my crazy sugar habit. The kids have crap in the house I don't like, and I don't really buy it, so I am doing alright for now, but Halloween was a gigantic fail! I don't care about cake or ice cream or hard candy or popsicles, but give me a snickers or peanut/almond/peanut butter mm's and oh my goodness. Heaven.

Speaking of heaven, I finally told Charlie he wouldn't have a body in heaven. It has come up a few times and I thought he was too young. It was a funny reaction. He was like, I am not going to have a head?! Yeah, still pretty tough for a 5 yr old to wrap your brain around. Heck, hard for me! But it was cute because he said eating anything he wanted was going to be his favorite part of heaven! lol. He is totally my kid. Anyway, he found the silver lining. Does that mean no naps? You got it buddy. He was very happy. Me, naps sound like heaven to me, but what do I know? I trust whatever God has waiting for us, it will blow the top of almond mm's :)

Since my theme today is there is no theme, I will add I went back and read the chapter from Jen Hat.maker's book 7 on stress. I love how she prays 7 times daily, so I bought the book Seven Sacred Pauses. I got it out again yesterday and started making notes. I would really like to do this. Pray for those with addiction, orphans alone, fresh starts, etc based on the position of the sun. I just really want to be more mindful during my day. Right now I am mostly just aware of how much time I am wasting.

If you don't mind saying a prayer for dh and I, I would appreciate it. We are only "together" when we are ttc right now and we also abstain for pregnancies so...it's been really hard. It seems when that drops off, in general we just start feeling or acting more separate-hard to know which comes first but its a perpetual cycle that takes really conscious effort to break.

On a totally unrelated note, but I know you will appreciate it, dh and I have tickets to go see Jim Gaffigan! Hopefully a date night will help bring back that feeling of closeness! I just liked him on fb and oh my, his statuses are so entertaining. For lots of fun buy Dad is Fat on audio. He reads it and it is 5 1/2 hrs of comedy. If you don't believe, just watch the you tube trailer for Mr. Universe or rent it for a buck on redbox. Good stuff!


Dreams Do Come True The Cat Writers' Association


Dreams Do Come True The Cat Writers' Association


Logo courtesy of the CWA/Debbie Glovatsky
I've enjoyed writing since I was a little girl. It took me into adulthood before I found my niche, which is why the blog you are reading today evolved from solely a book review blog to a celebration of all things feline andfiction (and feline fiction/nonfiction!).
I have a file folder in my desk filled with articles I printed out from the Cat Writers' Association websitedated 2006. I studied the membership requirements and made a vow to myself that one day I would become a member of this exclusive group of cat writers. It took me another 5 years to start blogging, and even more time after that before I realized I had a passion for blogging about cats just as much as blogging about books. (And as I always say, cats and books just go together, don't they?)
I finally realized that as a blogger, I am a writer. Thanks to the encouragement of the lovely Layla Morgan Wilde of Cat Wisdom 101, with butterflies in my stomach I filled out my CWA application and went to work putting together my work samples. Half of my submissions were sponsored posts that I have received compensation for, and the other half were pieces I wrote about Tara. She inspired this whole journey.
Wednesday night I received an email from CWA Secretary Wendy Christensen titledWelcome to the Cat Writers' Association, followed by a welcome from CWA President Lorie Huston, DVM. This is really happening. I'm a Professional Member of the Cat Writers' Association. I'm part of a group of writers whose work I have admired for years.
I am so honored and excited for the future of this blog and any other opportunities yet to come.
Dreams do come true, and for me, it's all for the love of cats.


Book Quote Saturday! 28


Book Quote Saturday! 28



BOOK QUOTE SATURDAY!
During my
reading of the book All You Ever Wanted
To Know From His Holiness The Dalai Lama On Happiness, Life, Living, and Much
More Conversations with Rajiv Mehrotra there are many statements that are
made that really have me thinking a great deal about health. For instance, the
following statement which has me thinking about the fact that even the words
that I use daily may be making me sick.“Scientific
research has shown that those individuals who often use words such as me, I,
and mine face a greater risk of a heart attack. If one always thinks of oneself,
ones thinking becomes very narrow; even a small problem appears very
significant and unbearable.”
I read this
over a number of times and had to wonder how many times in a day do I use those
words. Am I using them too much? The above quote is a great reminder that I
need to be mindful of my speech daily to attract great heart health.